The Bread of My Life (with Tomato, Salt, Pepper, and Mayo)
Tuesday, June 30, 2015
Minutes of the Snake Committee
Blössm McBeans
3 hrs
·
If you see a snake, just kill it - don't appoint a committee on snakes
- H. Ross Perot
Like
·
Comment
4 people
like this.
Michael DeVore
smile emoticon
Like
·
Reply
·
2
·
3 hrs
Pamela Jeffers Crowe
Hahaha
Like
·
Reply
·
1
·
2 hrs
Cat Lane
While I would never kill a snake, I wish I'd taken the core message here to heart many years ago. Live and learn.
Like
·
Reply
·
1
·
2 hrs
Blössm McBeans
Yes...some things you just can't work with.
Like
·
Reply
·
2 hrs
Cat Lane replied
·
1 Reply
Katharine Alice Jones
Not good advice, because one shouldn't kill snakes. It's not just a bad example, it's a bad premise.
Unlike
·
Reply
·
1
·
2 hrs
Hide 85 Replies
Katharine Alice Jones
Action without understanding is bad.
Like
·
2 hrs
Cat Lane
I agree, but I took this to mean, if you are in clear and present anger, take whatever action you need. I spent years trying to reason with orcs....never again. At least thats how I took the expression.
Like
·
1
·
2 hrs
Michael DeVore
Ross Perot was not exactly known for being PC.
smile emoticon
Like
·
1
·
2 hrs
Katharine Alice Jones
But that's just my point. The danger isn't always so clear. How many snakes die because people don't know most snakes are harmless?
Like
·
2 hrs
Katharine Alice Jones
Just because something looks scary doesn't mean you should try to kill it.
Like
·
2 hrs
Cat Lane
Yeah, it's a bad analogy. I think my own form of idiocy is really special, I knew full well I was under seige but kept saying things like "can't we talk this through?"
Like
·
1
·
2 hrs
Cat Lane
The other thing is - when a thing doesn't really look scary, it can be vastly more terrible and dangerous.
Like
·
1
·
2 hrs
Katharine Alice Jones
Right. The subject is far more complex than Perot suggested. And understanding is the key to all things.
Like
·
1
·
2 hrs
Michael DeVore
I think though, that it is as if you are worried about the characters in the analogy more than the meaning. He could have used anything for the snake but he is a Texan. It is like saying that hares should never race tortoises because tortoises are known to have heart attacks.
Like
·
1
·
1 hr
Katharine Alice Jones
It's actually not like that at all because that makes no sense. Also, it has nothing to do with someone advocating thoughtless action.
Like
·
1 hr
Michael DeVore
He is not advocating thoughtless action. In his analogy the snake is an obvious thing that needs killed... there is no need for discussion. It is an analogy about unneeded bureaucracy. It is an opinion that is kinda funny and does make this discussion as silly as my tortoise example.
Like
·
1
·
1 hr
Michael DeVore
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=slbMe-aTY1A
Life of Brian sermon on the mount
Edited for fellowship of the...
YOUTUBE.COM
Like
·
Remove Preview
·
1 hr
Katharine Alice Jones
But that's the point! HE thought it was obvious it needed killing. He was wrong. He made a bad decision because he didn't know shit about snakes and remained ignorant by choice.
Like
·
1 hr
Michael DeVore
The snake is a character in an analogy. The analogy is sometimes right and sometimes wrong.
Like
·
1 hr
Katharine Alice Jones
It's an excellent analogy for what happens when violent people don't want to learn.
Like
·
1 hr
Michael DeVore
It is an analogy for this conversation as well.
Like
·
1 hr
Cat Lane
I actually think it's a pretty good discussion. Made me stop and consider some angles here. If I was under major attack, on any level, ever again I would not hesitate to put a stop to it by any means necessary.but I also think, that part of me - any of
us - that gives benefit of the doubt - that aims for peaceful resolution - is our better part. I would never want to become a hot head who just lashes out in panic at the first sign of danger. But if danger is close, you do what you have to do.
Like
·
1
·
1 hr
Michael DeVore
By the way, the analogy to a Texan is that of a rattlesnake about to attack. If you discuss it too long, you are dead.
Like
·
1
·
1 hr
Cat Lane
Thats actually what I took t to mean and why I agreed with it (in those cases). I like to think that, most of the time, you can get out of harm's way.
smile emoticon
Like
·
1
·
1 hr
Michael DeVore
I cannot believe I am defending Ross Perot. Yesterday I was defending Lynyrd Skynyrd. The world is upside down.
Like
·
2
·
1 hr
Cat Lane
We 're not defending HIM, just that one line.
Lynryd Skynyrd - now that's scary.
Like
·
1
·
1 hr
·
Edited
Katharine Alice Jones
I would describe the cause of your previous predicament as the fact that you failed to understand that they couldn't be reasoned with. Lack of understanding.
If in another situation you failed to understand that someone you thought was your enemy COUL
D be reasoned with, the result would be another mistake.
Now, if Ross Perot had said "rattlesnake" we all know rattlesnakes actually are dangerous. "Snakes" is completely different and changes the implications of the statement. He didn't say anything about a rattlesnake, he generalized that all snakes are like rattlesnakes and should be treated the same. It's essentially the same thing as racial profiling.
Like
·
1 hr
Katharine Alice Jones
The quote makes the assumption that the only thing anyone might reasonably do with any snake, ever, under any circumstances, is kill it. Bad logic.
Like
·
1 hr
Michael DeVore
lol. Yeah, it went like this. The person said that Nazis has popularized the confederate flag. I said that while true, Lynyrd Skynyrd should be given due credit as well. Then the person said that divine intervention had killed the band for the flag and that he was glad they were dead. I said "hatred ceases not with hatred." and it went from there.
Like
·
2
·
1 hr
Katharine Alice Jones
So this was a crazy person...
Like
·
1 hr
Michael DeVore
There are times that demand quick action and delay would mean disaster. There are also times that the opposite is true. That is the analogy. When there is something obvious, action is required.
Like
·
1
·
1 hr
Michael DeVore
No... this was a liberal correspondent.
Like
·
1 hr
Michael DeVore
Possibly a crazy liberal correspondent... yes.
Like
·
1
·
1 hr
Michael DeVore
Analogy: a young man comes into the emergency with a gunshot wound. The doctors have a meeting deciding what to do. The patient bleeds out.
Like
·
1 hr
Katharine Alice Jones
I agree with THAT sentiment, but I don't think that's what Perot was saying. He was implying that all situations require quick action. He didn't say anything about there being other situation.
Like
·
1 hr
Michael DeVore
That is exactly what he is saying.
Like
·
1 hr
Michael DeVore
His situation was specific. A snake (to him an immediate threat).
Like
·
1 hr
Michael DeVore
A fuller rendition of this analogy: I come from an environment where, if you see a snake, you kill it. At GM, if you see a snake, the first thing you do is go hire a consultant on snakes. Then you get a committee on snakes, and then you discuss it for
...
See More
Like
·
1
·
1 hr
Katharine Alice Jones
But the snake wasn't really a threat.
Like
·
1
·
1 hr
Michael DeVore
And the hare did not have heart disease. It is extraneous to the analogy.
Like
·
1 hr
Katharine Alice Jones
You need to build an environment where the first guy who sees a snake knows whether or not that particular species of snake is dangerous and reacts to a situation correctly.
Like
·
1 hr
Michael DeVore
gees. he comes from an environment where a snake is dangerous.
Like
·
1 hr
Michael DeVore
He has set the fact up in the first sentence.
Like
·
1 hr
Michael DeVore
In his analogy the snake roams around dangerous.
Like
·
1 hr
Katharine Alice Jones
All snakes? You're saying there are no non-venomous snakes in Texas?
Like
·
1 hr
Michael DeVore
I am saying that you must stipulate that the snake is dangerous or you are not talking about his analogy but some other.
Like
·
1 hr
Katharine Alice Jones
He didn't stipulate that at all.
Like
·
1 hr
Katharine Alice Jones
He didn't say "If you see a dangerous snake" he said any snake. He advised killing harmless animals just in case they might be dangerous.
Like
·
1 hr
Michael DeVore
He doesn't stipulate. He asks you to stipulate that this is a dangerous snake up front. Otherwise, don't listen because you will not get the meaning.
Like
·
1 hr
Michael DeVore
It is a simple analogy. My coworker laughed heartily at it.
smile emoticon
Like
·
1
·
1 hr
Katharine Alice Jones
The meaning was, essentially, assume everything you don't understand needs to be killed, understanding is for saps.
Like
·
1 hr
Michael DeVore
I had heard it before. It is part of the story of how Pixar was not purchased by GM.
smile emoticon
Like
·
1 hr
Michael DeVore
It is as if he said: If a snake is dangerous then you must kill it before it kills you. Don't hold a meeting about it.
Like
·
1 hr
·
Edited
Michael DeVore
The meaning could essentially be: laugh at the analogy because it is funny. Don't pick it apart on a long thread.
smile emoticon
Like
·
1 hr
Katharine Alice Jones
It's not as if he said that. Again, it's as if he said "All snakes are dangerous. Kill them."
Like
·
1 hr
Michael DeVore
Nowhere in the analogy is the snake not actually dangerous. He comes from an environment where a snake is dangerous. .
Like
·
1 hr
Katharine Alice Jones
There is no environment where "a snake is dangerous". In fact, he comes from an environment where it is acceptable to kill things for no reason.
Like
·
1 hr
Michael DeVore
lol
Like
·
1 hr
Michael DeVore
I promised myself not to give up.
Like
·
1
·
1 hr
Michael DeVore
The analogy is a situation where quick action is required.
Like
·
1 hr
Katharine Alice Jones
Nope. It's a situation where rash action causes you to kill something that pretty much just wanted to avoid you.
Like
·
1 hr
Michael DeVore
Are you saying there is no situation that does not require quick action?
Like
·
1 hr
Michael DeVore
I think you are saying that it is ironic that Ross Perot should use the snake as a villain. Is that what you are saying?
Like
·
1 hr
Katharine Alice Jones
There no situation which requires you to take violent action without understanding the situation.
Like
·
1 hr
Michael DeVore
Violence is not necessary for the meaning of the analogy.
Like
·
1 hr
Michael DeVore
Do you think that every situation would end out correctly if violence was not used?
Like
·
1 hr
Katharine Alice Jones
If you see a snake, it takes less than a tenth of a second to determine whether or not it is acting aggressively.
Like
·
1 hr
Michael DeVore
You are close. That is what you must stipulate to understand the analogy.
Like
·
1 hr
Katharine Alice Jones
If it is not, walk the fuck away. If it is, still walk the fuck away because it's a snake and it doesn't WANT to bite you.
Like
·
1 hr
Michael DeVore
You are reading too much into the snake. Ross Perot says the snake is dangerous up front.
Like
·
1 hr
Katharine Alice Jones
No he doesn't.
Like
·
1 hr
Michael DeVore
Are you parsing the word "dangerous?"
Like
·
1 hr
Katharine Alice Jones
The word dangerous is not present.
Like
·
1 hr
Michael DeVore
So, when faced with a fuller rendition of the analogy containing the word "dangerous" you cannot see that this was the meaning of the shortened version of the analogy (which honestly I am not sure he said.)
Like
·
1 hr
Michael DeVore
Is Ross Perot dead? Because otherwise he should pay me.
smile emoticon
Like
·
1
·
1 hr
Michael DeVore
I will agree to disagree with you if you want.
Like
·
1 hr
Michael DeVore
i dont' usually shill for billionaires.
smile emoticon
Like
·
1
·
1 hr
Michael DeVore
Well.. nice chatting with you.. Is it ok if I use your name when I blog this because I would like to.
Like
·
1 hr
Blössm McBeans
Ross Perot is alive and just turned 85.
Like
·
1 hr
Michael DeVore
Somehow, I'm glad.
Like
·
1
·
1 hr
Michael DeVore
It would be terrible if he had died of a snakebite.
smile emoticon
Like
·
1
·
1 hr
Katharine Alice Jones
Feel free. This was fun.
Like
·
1 hr
Katharine Alice Jones
He'll certainly never die of a snake bite, but he might well die from bad assumptions.
Unlike
·
1
·
59 mins
Michael DeVore
My wife is extremely frightened of snakes. She cannot even watch one on a TV show. I tell her that it is unlikely that snakes around the house are dangerous but.. that is not nearly enough. So... a snake was under a bunch of weeds I was pulling. I abou
t had a heart attack myself. I have no idea if he was dangerous. I just stomped my feet in case he was so he would go away. He did. I would not even consider telling my wife or she would not go out in the yard.
Like
·
57 mins
Michael DeVore
I was always told to stomp my feet if I think there is a snake around as they don't really want to harm you. I'll hope that is true.
Like
·
54 mins
Katharine Alice Jones
I was afraid of snakes as a child, so I responded to my fear by studying them. I can now accurately identify every venomous snake in the South East US at a glance, and determine if any snake in the world is venomous, at a glance.
That is correct. The
ONLY notable exception being the territorial cottonmouth, which has been known to actively chase people, but will not bite as long as you retreat.
Now if a cottonmouth takes up residence in your yard, kill it. You'll know because it will hiss aggressively and show a white mouth full of very obvious fangs.
Like
·
1
·
51 mins
Katharine Alice Jones
Rattlesnakes also do not tend to retreat, but of course they make a distinctive sound.
Like
·
50 mins
Cat Lane
I love my snake-babies. I often have one around my neck while I work here.
Unlike
·
2
·
45 mins
·
Edited
Michael DeVore
I'm just getting my second wind. Let's discuss "Had it been a snake, it would have bitten me." next.
smile emoticon
Like
·
43 mins
Katharine Alice Jones
Also a flawed logic. If it had been a snake it would have left because it doesn't want to be near you.
Newer Posts
Older Posts
Home
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)